| my account | login-logout | resources | support | catalog | home | get webcard |

Online Classroom

Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
search | help desk | commons
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Online Classroom   » Inland and Coastal Navigation   » Public Discussion of Inland and Coastal Navigation   » Problem 1-17

Author Topic: Problem 1-17
James Muniz

 - posted January 23, 2005 12:30 PM      Profile for James Muniz           Edit/Delete Post 
On problem 1-17 I get 48:16.3 N, 122:58.6 W using the great circle calculator. and using a regular calculator I get 48:16.27 N, 122:58.6 W. The answer shows 48:16.27 N, 122:58.7 W. Is that a miss-print, if not how did we get .1 W difference.
David Burch

 - posted January 23, 2005 01:22 PM      Profile for David Burch           Edit/Delete Post 
First I should stress that these differences are small in light of this being a plotting problem. That is, 16.30 vs 16.27 in lat = 0.03 x 6000 ft = 60 yards, and 58.6 vs 58.7 in longitude is 0.1' x 6000 x cos 48 = 133 yards.

So we are getting errors of about 100 yards out of 3.5 miles = 100/(3.5x2000) = 1.4%

[If the above reckoning is not clear, please post a question and i can go into more detail in a different topic. It is fair to assume it is a plotting problem because the numerical position was not given for the starting point.]

With that all said, we go back to your question. If you are using a calculator for the solution, then you must have had a digital lat lon for the buoy. What value did you have for that? From there we can look into the differences.... and i must also add that in the world of hi precision GPS (away from this particular problem) these differences are indeed significant and it is fair to raise the question.

But to pursue this we need to know what the input was and what formula you used for the "regular calculator" solution.

Looking ahead, the difference between great circle and Mercator computation for this short distance should not be as large as 0.1' of lon—at least that is my guess till we work it out.

From: Starpath, Seattle, WA
James Muniz

 - posted January 24, 2005 06:17 PM      Profile for James Muniz           Edit/Delete Post 
I was using the position 48:19.8 N, 122:58.6 W from the Light List for Buoy RA. 3.5 n.mi.=3.5'
19.8'-3.5'=16.3'thus 48:16.3 N As for the Longitude I cannot figure that out. If we travel South (180) should the Longitude still be 122:58.6

All times are Pacific  
Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Starpath School of Navigation

Copyright, 2003-2021, Starpath Corporation

Powered by Infopop Corporation