| my account | login-logout | resources | support | catalog | home | get webcard |

Online Classroom


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
search | help desk | commons
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Online Classroom   » Celestial Navigation   » Public Discussion of Cel Nav   » Sight Reduction tables Z value discrepancy

   
Author Topic: Sight Reduction tables Z value discrepancy
eutectic77


 - posted December 11, 2020 08:12 AM      Profile for eutectic77           Edit/Delete Post 
I have come across what looks like a discrepancy in the Z value between the “Declination (0°-14°) Same Name Latitude” table in the class textbook and “Pub. 249 Vol. 3 Sight Reduction” table from the link “Celnav Course Material page” from Quiz CN07 and I’m not sure if I’m looking at this right. I came across this while working “7.4 Altair Sight Exercise, Star #3”.

For a-lat = 45°N, Dec=N8°, LHA=305°
Box 5 tab Hc (textbook) = 30° 00’ +45 111°
Box 5 tab Hc (online link to Pub 249). = 30° 00’ +45 110°

Shouldn’t these tables have the same values?
Thank you

David Burch


 - posted December 11, 2020 10:40 AM      Profile for David Burch           Edit/Delete Post 
I believe this is a rounding error from one year to the next in the computations.

see this earlier note

https://www.starpath.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=4;t=001186#000004

From: Starpath, Seattle, WA
eutectic77


 - posted December 11, 2020 11:54 AM      Profile for eutectic77           Edit/Delete Post 
Great, the link you provided explained this situation well.
The resulting rounding difference is an insignificant factor in our Zn calculations and the Z value could be slightly different, because of rounding, depending on the publication source used for sight reduction.



All times are Pacific  
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Starpath School of Navigation

Copyright, 2003-2021, Starpath Corporation

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.1